Categories
Blog

Young, Austen, Keats and Burns: a local perspective on the ‘immortal memory’

Back in 2020, I was asked by the 820th Mayor of Winchester, Cllr Eleanor Bell, to propose the toast to the ‘immortal memory’ of Robert Burns at her Burns night supper – at the Holiday Inn just outside Winchester. I had little idea of what was involved and no idea what to write, but thought it might be fun to try and add a local angle to my comments. After a day or two’s amateur research, I came up with something close to the following, although I have slightly expanded and corrected it before publishing it today. Given the short section about Jane Austen, it seemed particularly apposite to make it available today: January 25 is Burns Night and 2025 is the 250th anniversary year of Jane Austen’s birth:


Thank you, Madam Mayor, for the opportunity to say a few words about the life of Robert Burns.

I cannot claim any particular expertise or insight. Despite a Scottish heritage – the Tods originally come from Dalkeith in Midlothian – I can’t claim to have read all his works.  However I will try my best to provide some unexpected insight – and bring to light a few aspects of his life that you might know.

Born in 1759 just outside Ayr – the son of a tenant farming family.  He lived in difficult circumstances. His father continuously struggled financially – although the family made sure he got as good an education as they could afford.

He worked for many years as an agricultural worker and as a tenant farmer himself.  It was only following the spectacular success of his first published book of poems that his circumstances were transformed.

He moved to Edinburgh before spending all the money he’d earned in about 18 months and retraining as Excise Officer.

But then, tragically young, his health began to fail – and he died at the age of 37.

A man of enormous passions – he had, shall we say, a colourful love life – 12 children are known of – from at least 4 different mothers – only one of which he married – and there are more than 900 direct descendants of his alive today – but also great political passions – and a great ability to capture those passions and the passions of everyday life in verse.

I’m going to try something quite brave now and seek to find linkages between Robert Burns and Winchester

We know that Robert Burns is Scotland’s favourite poet.

But who was Robert Burns’s favourite poet?

Or rather who was the poet he most liked to quote…

And this is something we know – and we know the quote he most appreciated – and repeatedly cited in his letters:

“On reason build resolve
That column of true majesty in man!”

Described by Burns as “My most favourite quotation” in a letter on 10th August 1788.

He really likes this quote – in another letter he writes:

Come, then, let me act up to my favourite motto, that glorious passage in Young:
“On reason build resolve
That column of true majesty in man!”

And who is the Young he refers to?

The Reverend Edward Young.

Born at Upham in 1683. Educated at Winchester College. A true Winchester district man.

Taken from his poem “Night Thoughts” written between 1742 and 1745 – which some of you may know from the engravings prepared for it by William Blake.

And some of you may also know the quote:

Procrastination is the thief of time

Some of you may live it!

The reference to reason and resolve wasn’t the only part of Night Thoughts that Burns liked to cite – another quote – surprisingly relevant and surprisingly prescient for today’s world of fake news:

“What Truth on earth so precious as the Lie!”

and again, from the same, when Burns was unclear how one of his works would turn out, he cited Young’s:

“Tis nonsense destin’d to be future sense.”

And one of Burn’s most brilliant, insightful and oft-cited phrases

‘Man’s inhumanity to man’

also clearly echoes the same poem’s

”man’s revenge, and endless inhumanities on man’

Burns may never have set foot in our county, but if we believe his letters, one of our former residents clearly provided him with a fair share of creative and philosophical inspiration.

So now we know a bit of what Burns thought about a poet originally from our area.

I’m not going to claim any literary knowledge, but I am interested to know what writers from our area thought of Burns.

What, for example, did Jane Austen think of Burns?

We can’t know exactly, but in her unfinished novel Sanditon, sadly unfinished due to her death in our town only a mile or two from here, she has the heroine, Charlotte Heywood say of Burns:

 ‘I have read several of Burn’s Poems with great delight,’ said Charlotte as soon as she had time to speak, ‘but I am not poetic enough to separate a Man’s Poetry entirely from his Character; – and poor Burns’s known Irregularities, greatly interrupt my enjoyment of his Lines. – I have difficulty in depending on the Truth of his Feelings as a Lover. I have not faith in the sincerity of the affections of a Man of his Description. He felt & he wrote & he forgot.’ ”

While Burns may be Scotland’s favourite poet – I think we can see from that why Jane Austen is England’s favourite novelist.

They are, of course, the opinions of Jane Austen’s heroine – and not of Jane Austen herself. But would she have cited those feelings of ‘great delight’ if they weren’t feelings she had herself. I suspect not!

John Keats – one of our greatest Romantic poets – what does he think of the Scotland poet who helped blaze the way for the romantic movement.

We all know that in September 1819 he came to Winchester and wrote his famous ‘Ode to Autumn’ either on a walk through the meadows to St Cross or up to newly planted corn fields on St Giles’s Hill depending on whom you believe.

“Season of mists and mellow fruitfulness, close bosom-friend of the maturing sun.”

(Intriguingly, Burns was also quite a fan of autumn. He wrote in a letter in August 1793 that “Autumn is my propitious season; I make more verses in it than all the year else.”)

But coming back to Keats, you may not know that the summer before he visited Winchester, he went on a walking tour of Scotland, Ireland and the Lake District with a close friend.  And that he deliberately designed the tour to include Burn’s birthplace and his grave.

On July 13, 1818 he visited Burns’s birthplace and wrote to a friend about it.

Then we proceede[d] to the Cottage he was born in – there was a board to that effect by the door side – it had the same effect as the same sort of memorial at Stratford on Avon – We drank some Toddy to Burns’s Memory with an old Man who knew Burns – damn him and damn his Anecdotes – he was a great bore – it was impossible for a Southron to understand above 5 words in a hundred. – There was something good in his description of Burns’s melancholy the last time he saw him. I was determined to write a sonnet in the Cottage – I did – but it was so bad I cannot venture it here.

However after visiting Burn’s tomb, on July 2, 1818, Keats was rather more successful –

On visiting the tomb of Burns

The town, the churchyard, and the setting sun,
     The clouds, the trees, the rounded hills all seem,
     Though beautiful, cold—strange—as in a dream
I dreamed long ago. Now new begun,
The short-lived, paly summer is but won
     From winter’s ague, for one hour’s gleam;
     Though sapphire warm, their stars do never beam;
All is cold beauty; pain is never done
For who has mind to relish, Minos-wise,
     The real of beauty free from that dead hue
     Sickly imagination and sick pride
Cast wan upon it! Burns! with honour due
     I have oft honoured thee. Great shadow, hide
Thy face—I sin against thy native skies.

So as we gather here in Winchester today – and ponder the greatness of Robert Burns – we are lucky to have two local guides to help us along the way – and one man who was a guide to Robert Burns in his journey to greatness.

Edward Young provided Burns with poetic inspiration and Burn’s favourite motto.

Jane Austen seemed unsure of Burn’s morals – but completely clear that we should read his poems with great delight.

And John Keats was so inspired by Burns that he designed a walking tour to visit the sites where he had lived and wrote poetry in his honour.

We can do no less than join them in our admiration.

So please be upstanding and let us join with Keats in honouring Burns, with Austen in delighting in his poetry.

And toasting the immortal memory of Robert Burns.

Categories
Blog Housing Winchester

Conservative plans for ‘right to buy’ are bonkers and will mean we lose a large proportion of council housing in Winchester.

The Conservatives have announced plans to force councils to sell off the most expensive 210,000 council houses and use the money to pay for a national programme of ‘right to buy’ for housing associations right across the country.

For Winchester this will be a catastrophe!

Why?

First, nearly half (48%) of all councils have sold off or transferred their council housing to housing associations.  Only around have of all councils actually have any council housing at all, and only the councils that do will be paying for this national programme: Winchester is one of them.

This unavoidably means that sales of council housing in Winchester (and other areas with council housing) will be subsidising ‘right to buy’ in the rest of the country. And because we haven’t transferred our council housing to housing associations, we also have less housing association housing than other areas – and so our area will get even less of this money!

To put it another way, 52% of councils – including Winchester – will be subsidising ‘right to buy’ in the other 48% of council areas.

The second problem is that Winchester is an expensive area – in the top 10% of the country for house prices – which means that a much higher proportion of our council housing will be amongst the most expensive 5% of council housing in the country and so will have to be sold when it becomes free.  We have a completely disproportionate share of the ‘most valuable 210,000 properties’ that the Conservatives are planning on using to fund the scheme.  As soon as a family home becomes available, it won’t be used to support people in housing need, but will be flogged off on the open market to pay for ‘right to buy’ somewhere else in the country. And because the biggest cost relating to housing is the cost of the land, we won’t be able to afford to build many replacements. At best, the only type of new council housing we could manage each time we were forced to sell a family homes would be a small flat – and that doesn’t help tackle our affordable housing problem.

So the net effect of this policy is a disaster.  A large proportion of our council housing – especially bigger family homes – will have to be sold off. And our area will see hardly any of the money.

It’s completely bonkers. And another reason to vote for Jackie Porter as the only way to stop the Tories in Winchester on May 7.

Categories
Blog

What do ‘serious parties of government’ do? And what does it mean for how the Lib Dems need to change?

We’ve heard a lot from Nick Clegg and the people round him that we need to be a ‘party of government’.  Almost all Lib Dems agree with that – although many disagree strongly that this also means that we should stop being ‘a party of change’ and turn into a ‘party of the status quo’ – as our recent European campaign seemed to suggest.

But let’s focus on what we all agree on – and focus on the importance of being a ‘serious party of government’. Here are a few thoughts on what other ‘serious parties of government’ do differently to the Lib Dems and what that might mean for how the direction of the party needs to change.

Here goes:

‘Serious parties of government’ make pledges and, generally, try to keep them

One of the stranger consequences of the tuition fees catastrophe is that the leadership and leadership loyalists have decided that the Liberal Democrats shouldn’t make pledges any more.

The other ‘serious parties of government’ don’t agree with them.

While Labour don’t always appear to be serious about government now, they certainly were under Tony Blair in 1997.  Remember this?

Labour's 1997 General Election Pledge CardIt’s a pledge card.  It even has the word ‘pledge’ written on it. And Labour were pretty serious about keeping to them.

What about the 2010 pledge from David Cameron on government support for pensioners?

He’s kept it – even though it’s far more expensive than, say, the tuition fees pledge.  And he’s just made another couple with a 2017 referendum on Europe as a ‘cast iron pledge and another pledge to pensioners to increase the pension by 2.5% a year till 2020.

And this is hardly surprising.  People want to know what ‘serious parties of government’ want to do in the future.  This is particularly important in a coalition when there’s a real danger of giving the impression that what the government is doing is all you’re about.

That’s why the Conservatives are smart to be making pledges. And why it’s wrong for the Lib Dems to have decided they’re always a bad idea.

When in coalition, ‘serious parties of government’ make clear what they’re being stopped from doing

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have taken almost diametrically opposed approaches to communicating their achievements in coalition.

Nick and his central team of advisors have gone with a “what we’ve got and what we’ve stopped” strategy – outlining Lib Dem achievements in Government – and what we’ve stopped the Conservatives from doing.

David Cameron and the Conservatives have gone with a “what we’ve got and what we’ve been stopped from doing” strategy and haven’t put any effort into telling voters what they’ve stopped the Liberal Democrats from doing.

David Cameron’s strategy is working better.

Ultimately this is hardly surprising. While not repudiating the achievements of the coalition, the Conservative strategy makes it clear that they want to be doing something more and different to what the coalition government alone is able to achieve.

The Liberal Democrat strategy does the opposite. It reinforces the Conservative message (always a bad sign) – and does nothing to give any steer on what the Liberal Democrats would be doing or trying to do if governing alone or negotiating a new coalition.

Focusing on what you’ve stopped the Conservatives doing also reminds people of what you’ve not stopped the Conservatives doing – which, unavoidably in a coalition, is going to include a bunch of things your supporters are unhappy about.

In essence, it leaves the Liberal Democrats defending the coalition as the best of all possible worlds, rather than making clear – as we should always be doing – how we want things to be better than they are today.

Not smart. Not something that ‘serious parties of government’ do. And something that needs to change.

The most successful ‘serious parties of government’ challenge the status quo

Political theorists like to contrast establishment parties and challenger parties, but real life experience suggests that the most successful politicians and ‘serious parties of government’ are able to ride both horses.

Keith House has laid out the case for being a ‘party of government and a party of protest’ on Lib Dem Voice – and I had a go on the BBC on the issue of not being a ‘party of complacency and the status quo.

Even more simply, Nick Clegg was the insurgent in the 2010 Prime Ministerial debates and won (at least the first one). He was the representative of the establishment in the 2014 EU debates and lost. Of course, that’s not the whole story. But a large chunk of the British electorate – left, right and centre – are looking for change from where we are today – and only one person in the 2014 debate was seen to be offering it.

Two of the most striking examples lie outside the Liberal Democrats.

It’s no coincidence that Britain’s most electorally successful Prime Ministers – Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair – started out being seen as outsiders challenging the status quo and having an agenda for change – and stayed that way more or less until the end.

Margaret Thatcher – to put it mildly - never gave any sense of satisfaction with the status quo or with the establishment until the day she died.

In both cases this could put them in conflict with members of their own party, but this was generally because they were seen as wanting to change things too much or too quickly – and not because they appeared to be taking things too slowly.

And it wasn’t just something that happened to get them elected first time. It was something they kept doing all the way through their terms of office.

Is that all there is to it?

Unfortunately not. There’s the small matter of delivering distinctive policy in government (and not just what was agreed back in 2010 in the coalition agreement) – and having the right set of policies that take you beyond the status quo.

It’s possible for a policy to be radical, promised in your manifesto and wildly unpopular – as Margaret Thatcher discovered with the poll tax.

But a complacent defence of the current situation and treating the coalition government as the best of all possible worlds is no longer an option. If the leadership of our party could learn from other ‘parties of government’, start telling us what they want to do if they weren’t held back by the Conservatives – what we’d be delivering if we had more MPs and a stronger position in Government - and get the party back to challenging the status quo, it would be a huge step in the right direction.

Featured on Liberal Democrat Voice

Categories
Blog Conference

What are our ministers’ signature achievements?

One of the great things about Lib Dem Conference is that you can ask all kinds of questions to different people in public and they have to answer.

Here’s my question to the Chief Whips of the Lords and Commons Parliamentary Parties:

For each Minister based in the Commons/Lords, what do they consider to be their ‘signature  achievement’ – the achievement they have made as a minister that most clearly demonstrates the difference that Liberal Democrats – and they – are making in Government?

I look forward to their answers!

Categories
Blog Liberal Drinks

Aqua, deep red or orange? Vote for your favourite Liberal Drinks beermat

It’s time for Liberal Drinks to have a few beermats.

But what colour should they be? Or rather, what two colours should they be, because you can print different designs on each side?

The party seems to be getting over its love affair with ‘aqua‘. Strangely it never really started one with ‘dark red‘ even though it notionally had equal status to aqua in the Liberal Democrat brand guidelines!

I’ve thrown together a few designs and would really appreciate it you would vote to tell me which ones you like best. Just tick the ones you might be prepared to have under a pint glass in your local when you’re at Liberal Drinks.

Which beermats would you like to use?