{"id":87,"date":"2007-03-21T21:32:50","date_gmt":"2007-03-21T20:32:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/?p=87"},"modified":"2007-03-21T21:32:50","modified_gmt":"2007-03-21T20:32:50","slug":"fiasco","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/03\/fiasco\/","title":{"rendered":"Fiasco"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>For some reason I didn&#8217;t post this when I originally wrote it.  However it still seems to make sense, so I might as well post it now<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m reminded by <a href=\"http:\/\/oxfordliberal.blogspot.com\/2006\/09\/denial-doesnt-just-run-through-egypt.html\">Stephen Tall&#8217;s review of Bob Woodward&#8217;s, Plan of Attack<\/a>, that I&#8217;d intended to post a few words about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/gp\/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.co.uk%2FFiasco-American-Military-Adventure-Iraq%2Fdp%2F0713999535%2Fsr%3D8-1%2Fqid%3D1159682537%2Fref%3Dpd%5Fka%5F1%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks&#038;tag=liberaldemocrats&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=6738\">Fiasco, The American Military Adventure in Iraq<\/a> by Thomas Ricks.<\/p>\n<p>An astonishing and thorough account of the administration&#8217;s shocking incompetence and dismal political leadership in Iraq.  <\/p>\n<p>Before reading it, I hadn&#8217;t fully comprehended how badly things had been handled, and, in particular, the degree to which the success of the counter-insurgency was fueled by failures by the Americans on the ground in Iraq following their invasion.  More importantly, I hadn&#8217;t realised the degree to which their problems there were not wholly inevitable, but were a consequence of administration incompetence.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve always opposed the war, indeed, recently found the following, rather (although not wholly) prescient, note which I wrote to colleagues on the Federal Executive five days after US and UK troops invaded back in March 2003 &#8211; well before they had conquered Baghdad:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nThe possible problem (too soon to say that it is an emerging problem) is that the UK Government have misread the mood of the Iraqi people and we&#8217;re about to have a Germans vs. the Yugoslavs \/ Russia vs. the Afghans type situation. Quick decapitation of the government (which was always inevitable &#8211; although it may take longer than expected) followed by long resistance campaign &#8211; possibly with several competing resistance groups &#8211; but an ongoing flow of soldiers coming home in body bags &#8211; and where credibility in Iraqi politics is measured by the number of US and British soldiers your resistance group has killed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What Ricks&#8217;s book makes clear, it is that it genuinely didn&#8217;t need to be so bad. Even if you don&#8217;t accept that it was right to invade, it is still possible to want the insurgency to have been fought using a few of the ABCs of Counter-Insurgency, such as those laid out in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/gp\/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.co.uk%2FLearning-Eat-Soup-Knife-Counterinsurgency%2Fdp%2F0226567702%2Fsr%3D1-1%2Fqid%3D1159685273%2Fref%3Dsr%5F1%5F1%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks&#038;tag=liberaldemocrats&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=6738\">Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam<\/a> by John A. Nagl, not least because it would likely have meant fewer civilian, US and UK casualities. In essence, if Mao&#8217;s description of an insurgent army relying on the people for support &#8220;like fish swimming in the water of the population&#8221;, a primary role for the counter-insurgency is to separate the fish from the water.<\/p>\n<p>To give an idea of the scale of failure displayed by the Bush administration in Iraq, the closest example I can see is New Orleans. Rather than being a one off, this can now be seen as a vivid example on American home soil of the incompetent quality of leadership that W. et al have been providing overseas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For some reason I didn&#8217;t post this when I originally wrote it. However it still seems to make sense, so I might as well post it now I&#8217;m reminded by Stephen Tall&#8217;s review of Bob Woodward&#8217;s, Plan of Attack, that I&#8217;d intended to post a few words about Fiasco, The American Military Adventure in Iraq &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/2007\/03\/fiasco\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Fiasco&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iraq","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martintod.org.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}